CVE-2025-38351 (CNNVD-202507-2507)

UNKNOWN
中文标题:
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
英文标题:
KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush
CVSS分数: N/A
发布时间: 2025-07-19 11:59:34
漏洞类型: 其他
状态: PUBLISHED
数据质量分数: 0.40
数据版本: v4
漏洞描述
中文描述:

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于未过滤非规范地址,可能导致虚拟机故障。

英文描述:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush In KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercalls HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX allow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB. For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposed to be invalidated. However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently no filtering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations of INVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD's INVLPGA silently ignores non-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel's INVVPID explicitly signals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm] Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition's GVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether this ruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make that assumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms "real" Hyper-V interprets the specification in the same way. Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoid tripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out "bad" GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the only downside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing so is suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLB flushes for non-canonical addresses.

CWE类型:
(暂无数据)
标签:
(暂无数据)
受影响产品
厂商 产品 版本 版本范围 平台 CPE
Linux Linux - < d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d - cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Linux Linux 6.2 - - cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
linux linux_kernel * - - cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
linux linux_kernel 6.16 - - cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
解决方案
中文解决方案:
(暂无数据)
英文解决方案:
(暂无数据)
临时解决方案:
(暂无数据)
参考链接
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
CVSS评分详情
暂无CVSS评分信息
时间信息
发布时间:
2025-07-19 11:59:34
修改时间:
2025-08-28 14:43:05
创建时间:
2025-11-11 15:40:28
更新时间:
2026-01-12 02:27:44
利用信息
暂无可利用代码信息
数据源详情
数据源 记录ID 版本 提取时间
CVE cve_CVE-2025-38351 2025-11-11 15:23:18 2025-11-11 07:40:28
NVD nvd_CVE-2025-38351 2025-11-11 15:00:57 2025-11-11 07:48:17
CNNVD cnnvd_CNNVD-202507-2507 2025-11-11 15:12:51 2025-11-11 08:00:01
版本与语言
当前版本: v4
主要语言: EN
支持语言:
EN ZH
安全公告
暂无安全公告信息
变更历史
v4 NVD
2026-01-12 02:27:44
affected_products_count: 2 → 4
查看详细变更
  • affected_products_count: 2 -> 4
v3 CNNVD
2025-11-11 16:00:01
vulnerability_type: 未提取 → 其他; severity: SeverityLevel.MEDIUM → SeverityLevel.UNKNOWN; cvss_score: 未提取 → 0.0; cnnvd_id: 未提取 → CNNVD-202507-2507; data_sources: ['cve', 'nvd'] → ['cnnvd', 'cve', 'nvd']
查看详细变更
  • vulnerability_type: 未提取 -> 其他
  • severity: SeverityLevel.MEDIUM -> SeverityLevel.UNKNOWN
  • cvss_score: 未提取 -> 0.0
  • cnnvd_id: 未提取 -> CNNVD-202507-2507
  • data_sources: ['cve', 'nvd'] -> ['cnnvd', 'cve', 'nvd']
v2 NVD
2025-11-11 15:48:17
affected_products_count: 5 → 2; data_sources: ['cve'] → ['cve', 'nvd']
查看详细变更
  • affected_products_count: 5 -> 2
  • data_sources: ['cve'] -> ['cve', 'nvd']