CVE-2025-38472 (CNNVD-202507-3471)
中文标题:
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
英文标题:
netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry
漏洞描述
中文描述:
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于删除未初始化的连接跟踪条目,可能导致崩溃。
英文描述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---
CWE类型:
标签:
受影响产品
| 厂商 | 产品 | 版本 | 版本范围 | 平台 | CPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 594cea2c09f7cd440d1ee1c4547d5bc6a646b0e4 | - | - |
cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:594cea2c09f7cd440d1ee1c4547d5bc6a646b0e4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
| Linux | Linux | 5.19 | - | - |
cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:5.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | - | - |
cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.16 | - | - |
cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
| debian | debian_linux | 11.0 | - | - |
cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
解决方案
中文解决方案:
英文解决方案:
临时解决方案:
CVSS评分详情
时间信息
利用信息
数据源详情
| 数据源 | 记录ID | 版本 | 提取时间 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | cve_CVE-2025-38472 |
2025-11-11 15:23:18 | 2025-11-11 07:40:28 |
| NVD | nvd_CVE-2025-38472 |
2025-11-11 15:00:57 | 2025-11-11 07:48:17 |
| CNNVD | cnnvd_CNNVD-202507-3471 |
2025-11-11 15:12:52 | 2025-11-11 08:00:02 |
版本与语言
安全公告
变更历史
查看详细变更
- affected_products_count: 2 -> 5
查看详细变更
- vulnerability_type: 未提取 -> 其他
- severity: SeverityLevel.MEDIUM -> SeverityLevel.UNKNOWN
- cvss_score: 未提取 -> 0.0
- cnnvd_id: 未提取 -> CNNVD-202507-3471
- data_sources: ['cve', 'nvd'] -> ['cnnvd', 'cve', 'nvd']
查看详细变更
- references_count: 5 -> 6
- data_sources: ['cve'] -> ['cve', 'nvd']