CVE-2025-40096 (CNNVD-202510-4255)

UNKNOWN
中文标题:
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
英文标题:
drm/sched: Fix potential double free in drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies
CVSS分数: N/A
发布时间: 2025-10-30 09:48:03
漏洞类型: 其他
状态: PUBLISHED
数据质量分数: 0.30
数据版本: v3
漏洞描述
中文描述:

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies函数中可能发生双重释放。

英文描述:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/sched: Fix potential double free in drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies When adding dependencies with drm_sched_job_add_dependency(), that function consumes the fence reference both on success and failure, so in the latter case the dma_fence_put() on the error path (xarray failed to expand) is a double free. Interestingly this bug appears to have been present ever since commit ebd5f74255b9 ("drm/sched: Add dependency tracking"), since the code back then looked like this: drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(): ... for (i = 0; i < fence_count; i++) { ret = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fences[i]); if (ret) break; } for (; i < fence_count; i++) dma_fence_put(fences[i]); Which means for the failing 'i' the dma_fence_put was already a double free. Possibly there were no users at that time, or the test cases were insufficient to hit it. The bug was then only noticed and fixed after commit 9c2ba265352a ("drm/scheduler: use new iterator in drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies v2") landed, with its fixup of commit 4eaf02d6076c ("drm/scheduler: fix drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies"). At that point it was a slightly different flavour of a double free, which commit 963d0b356935 ("drm/scheduler: fix drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies harder") noticed and attempted to fix. But it only moved the double free from happening inside the drm_sched_job_add_dependency(), when releasing the reference not yet obtained, to the caller, when releasing the reference already released by the former in the failure case. As such it is not easy to identify the right target for the fixes tag so lets keep it simple and just continue the chain. While fixing we also improve the comment and explain the reason for taking the reference and not dropping it.

CWE类型:
(暂无数据)
标签:
(暂无数据)
受影响产品
厂商 产品 版本 版本范围 平台 CPE
Linux Linux - < 4c38a63ae12ecc9370a7678077bde2d61aa80e9c - cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Linux Linux 5.16 - - cpe:2.3:a:linux:linux:5.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
解决方案
中文解决方案:
(暂无数据)
英文解决方案:
(暂无数据)
临时解决方案:
(暂无数据)
参考链接
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
无标题 OTHER
cve.org
访问
CVSS评分详情
暂无CVSS评分信息
时间信息
发布时间:
2025-10-30 09:48:03
修改时间:
2025-10-30 09:48:03
创建时间:
2025-11-11 15:40:30
更新时间:
2025-11-11 16:00:20
利用信息
暂无可利用代码信息
数据源详情
数据源 记录ID 版本 提取时间
CVE cve_CVE-2025-40096 2025-11-11 15:23:20 2025-11-11 07:40:30
NVD nvd_CVE-2025-40096 2025-11-11 15:01:07 2025-11-11 07:48:19
CNNVD cnnvd_CNNVD-202510-4255 2025-11-11 15:13:00 2025-11-11 08:00:20
版本与语言
当前版本: v3
主要语言: EN
支持语言:
EN ZH
安全公告
暂无安全公告信息
变更历史
v3 CNNVD
2025-11-11 16:00:20
vulnerability_type: 未提取 → 其他; severity: SeverityLevel.MEDIUM → SeverityLevel.UNKNOWN; cvss_score: 未提取 → 0.0; cnnvd_id: 未提取 → CNNVD-202510-4255; data_sources: ['cve', 'nvd'] → ['cnnvd', 'cve', 'nvd']
查看详细变更
  • vulnerability_type: 未提取 -> 其他
  • severity: SeverityLevel.MEDIUM -> SeverityLevel.UNKNOWN
  • cvss_score: 未提取 -> 0.0
  • cnnvd_id: 未提取 -> CNNVD-202510-4255
  • data_sources: ['cve', 'nvd'] -> ['cnnvd', 'cve', 'nvd']
v2 NVD
2025-11-11 15:48:19
affected_products_count: 6 → 2; data_sources: ['cve'] → ['cve', 'nvd']
查看详细变更
  • affected_products_count: 6 -> 2
  • data_sources: ['cve'] -> ['cve', 'nvd']